TALIBAN propagandists currently have one of
the easiest jobs going, remarked a Western official after news reached Kabul of
a shooting spree in rural Kandahar, in which an American staff sergeant killed
16 sleeping civilians. “If I were the Taliban spokesman I’d just sit back in a
cave and do nothing, and leave it all to us,” the official added.
The massacre, or “assassination” as Hamid
Karzai, the president of Afghanistan, described it, is but the latest disaster
to befall the NATO-led coalition. The shootings on March 11th in Panjwayi
district come less than three weeks after the inadvertent burning of Korans in
a rubbish pit at Bagram airfield. That caused days of nationwide protest which
left around 30 Afghans dead and more than 200 wounded. Reprisal attacks killing
American soldiers led to the temporary withdrawal of advisers from Afghan
ministries. In January a trophy video emerged of American soldiers urinating on
Taliban fighters they had killed in battle. These incidents come on top of the
usual round of civilian casualties from coalition airstrikes, which are less
frequent now but no less resented.
The aftermath of each incident follows a
similar trajectory. NATO is profuse in
its apologies or condolences. Mr Karzai rages, trying to strike a balance
between domestic populism and the need to work with the foreign allies he
relies on. Diplomatic assets are deployed to smooth relations. The Taliban,
which itself kills many civilians, seeks to capitalise on the crisis with inflammatory
statements about Western invaders. Countries with soldiers deployed in
Afghanistan brace themselves for revenge attacks on their troops.
In the case of the Panjwayi shootings, a
day after the killings the area was relatively calm. Elders in the area have
shown admirable restraint. Villagers did not want their anger to be manipulated
or misused, one elder told this newspaper.
For while many lost faith in foreign
soldiers long ago, that is not the same as wanting chaos, or the Taliban, back.
An attack on a village in rural Kandahar also does not have the power to
galvanise a fractured nation in the same way as an attack on their holiest book
did last month.
In fact, the political impact of the latest
shootings may be strongest in America and Europe. Officials in Kabul fear the
incidents give a damaging portrayal of a hapless mission, lurching from one
disaster to another. Each incident also feeds perceptions of an Afghan public
exasperated with, or even hostile to, the help being given. Nothing is as toxic
to support for a difficult overseas campaign as the feeling the recipients are
ungrateful.
According to a Washington Post-ABC News
poll conducted just before the shooting in Panjwayi, 55% of Americans believe
most Afghans are opposed to what NATO is
trying to accomplish there. 54% said America should pull its troops out even if
Afghan forces are unprepared to replace them. Barack Obama and his counterparts
are due to meet in May at NATO's summit
in Chicago, where they will discuss the scale of continuing support and the
pace of the troop withdrawal. Any more self-inflicted wounds would speed up the
alliance's exit.
No comments:
Post a Comment